background image
DigiCULT 11
C
ONCLUSION
O
ver the next five years the possibilities offered
by the Semantic Web will bring little near term
benefit for the heritage sector unless that sector co-
ordinates its efforts to ensure that the fundamental
building blocks that are necessary for the Semantic
Web to be a success are put in place.We need some
quick wins. A quick win involves identifying a
domain that every institution can be encouraged to
represent semantically and the placing in the public
domain of a `personalisable agent' that can take
advantage of these semantics.Three factors could
underpin a quick win: (a) a narrowly restricted
knowledge domain of real public value; (b) an
accessible and narrow ontology; and (c) a
personalisable tool for processing knowledge.
Ultimately the same factors that constrain the
heritage's sectors ability to take full advantage of the
Web will constrain the penetration and pervasiveness
of the Semantic Web in the heritage sector.The
success of the Semantic Web in the heritage sector
depends upon its adopting a XML based approach
and a significant experiment that demonstrates its
benefits to the wider community. Even for all its
weaknesses the Semantic Web offers a tantalising
solution to the problem of information overload
created by the web and the heritage sector needs to
address how it can take advantage of the
opportunities it offers.
Amann, B., Beeri, C., Fundulaki, I., and Scholl, M., 2002:
Ontology-Based Integration of XML Resources, in:
I. Horrocks and J. Hendler (eds.),The Semantic Web -
ISWC 2002. Berlin: Springer, 117-131.
Berners-Lee,T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., 2001:
The Semantic Web, in: Scientific American, May 2001.
Candan, K.S., Liu, H., and Suvarna, R., 2001: Resource
Description Framework: Metadata and Its Application,
in: SIGKDD Explorations, 3.1, 6-19, http://www.acm.org/
sigs/sigkdd/explorations/issue3-1/candan.pdf
Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., and Halevy A., 2002:
Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic
Web, in: Proceedings WWW2002, 7-11 May 2002 (Hono-
lulu), 662-673.
Gómez-Pérez, A., and Corcho, O., 2002: Ontology Languages
for the Semantic Web, in: IEEE Intelligent Systems, January/
February 2002, 54-60.
Haustein, S., and Pleumann, J., 2002: Is Participation in the
Semantic Web Too Difficult?, in: I. Horrocks and J. Hendler
(eds.),The Semantic Web -ISWC 2002. Berlin: Springer,
448-453.
Heflin, J., and Hendler, J.: A Portrait of the Semantic Web in
Action in: IEEE Intelligent Systems, March/April 2001, 54-59.
Hendler, J., 2001: Agents and the Semantic Web, in: IEEE
Intelligent Systems, March/April 2001, 30-37.
Hendler, J., Berners-Lee,T., and Miller, E., 2002: Integrating
Applications on the Semantic Web, in: Journal of the
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 120.10, 676-680.
Klein, M., 2001: XML, RDF, and Relatives, in: IEEE Intelligent
Systems, March/April 2001, 26-28.
McGuinness, D. L., Fikes, R., Hendler, J., and Stein, L. A., 2002:
DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web,
in: IEEE Intelligent Systems, September/October 2002, 72-80.
Patel-Schneider, P., and Siméon, J., 2002a: Building the
Semantic Web on XML, in: I. Horrocks and J.Hendler (eds.),
The Semantic Web ­ISWC 2002. Berlin: Springer, 147-161,
http://www-dbs.cs.uni-sb.de/lehre/ss03xml-seminar/
Material/PS02.pdf.
Patel-Schneider, P., and Siméon, J., 2002b:The Yin/Yang
Web: XML Syntax and RDF Semantics', in: Proceedings
WWW2002, 7-11 May 2002 (Honolulu), 443-453.
Renear, A., Dubin, D., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., and
Huitfeldt, C., 2002:Towards a Semantics for XML Markup,
in: DocEng'02, 8-9 November 2002 (McLean,VA).
ACM Publication.
Shah, U., Finin,T., Joshi, A., Cost R. S., and Mayfield, J., 2002:
Information Retrieval on the Semantic Web, in: CIKM'02,
4-9 November 2002, 461-468.
Bibliography: